Please work on either your presentations or your essays.
The presentation can include or should include 1) A hook, 2) an overview
of what you learned reading the book, 3) a overview of what you wrote
your essays on, 4) a visual aid, and 5) a conclusion.
You should put your presentation on note cards. You could also do your presentation as a PPT.
5) THE PRESENTATION: 3 minutes—this
should be an overview of your project and what you learned. It should
include a visual aid.
Scoring Rubric for Presentation:
4 – Presentation is more than 3 minutes and
contains more than 1 visual.
Presentation offers analysis on the book and an evaluation on the
student’s learning.
3 – Presentation is at least 3 minutes and
contains at least 1 visual aid.
Presentation offers insight on the student learning.
2 – Presentation is less than 3 minutes,
could be missing a visual aid and/or might not offer insight into the student’s
learning.
1 – Presentation is very short, could be
missing a visual aid (or visual aid is most of the presentation), and/or fails
to offer any insight into the student’s learning.
ORAL RUBRIC
|
Criteria
|
Exceeds Standard (4)
|
Meets Standard (3)
|
Needs Improvement (2)
|
|
Volume: How well you can be
heard
|
Voice is loud and clear
without the student yelling. All words
are heard. Student projects words from
their diaphragm.
|
Voice is loud throughout
most of presentation. One or more
words might be lost because of projection of volume, but the idea is still
clear.
|
Voice fades in places so
that the listener loses or misses parts of the presentation, or parts of the
idea
|
|
Pronunciation: How well you
say all your words
|
Words are pronounced
perfectly and sentences flow off of tongue
|
The speaker trips in one or
two places either in the pronunciation of a word or in reading a
sentence. The presentation is effected
only slightly by the mistakes.
|
The speaker trips in quite
a few places. The presentation is
effected more than slightly by the mistakes.
Mistakes either make the presentation hard to listen to or cloud the
ideas of the writing
|
|
Tone: Do you vary how you
say your sentences
|
Speaker as Actor: The speaker’s delivery makes the writing
come alive by giving it emotion, character, emphasis, by breathing life into
it
|
Speaker varies most of
sentences to express emotion or to emphasis importance of parts, but there
are still places when the speaker spoke in a lifeless monotone
|
Speaker speaks in a
monotone that reveals no emotion or does not emphasis any importance on any
idea
|
|
UHMS or AHS
|
NONE
|
1 or 2 but the uhms or ahs
do not distract the presentation
|
3 or more uhms or ahs
|
|
Eye Contact: do you look at
your audience
|
The speaker made a point to
look at everyone in the room and rarely looked as if they were reading from a
paper
|
Some eye contact is made,
but mostly the presenter read off of his or her paper
|
Little or no eye
contact. |
GRADING SCALE for Book Review/Personal
Response:
4 – Book Review reads like a “real book”
review but with a personal twist. Summary
is detailed but condensed. Personal
insight into why someone should read this novel. Insight includes analysis and textual
evidence, very few grammar errors in the writing.
3 – Summary is detailed and condensed. Personal insight into why someone should read
the novel included. Review might contain
some grammar errors but they do not inhibit readability.
2 – Summary included, but could be overtly
long or extremely short. Personal
insight into why someone should read the novel might be missing. Review could contain multiple grammar errors
that distracts the reader and/or affects readability.
1 – Brief reference to task.
3) THE LITERARY ANALYSIS: Choose one literary
element of the book and develop a thesis around it. Back up your thesis
statements with proof from the text.
This paper should be at least 3 pages.
Analysis Rubric:
|
FOCUS
(Claims, set-up)
|
Hook, Thesis Statement, Order of
development connects to an n overarching idea of the novel. Thesis is manageable.. Hook and thesis are connected by idea. Hook is witty or insightful.
|
Hook, Thesis Statement is present in
the first paragraph. Hook and thesis are connected by idea. Order of development is present.
|
There is a thesis statement but
either it is not clear, or the order of development and/or hook is missing.
|
No thesis statement
|
|
Examples and Analysis
|
At least five pieces of evidence from
novel. Evidence is either direct
quotation or paraphrases with page # citation. Commentary explains relationship between
evidence and thesis.
|
4-5 pieces of evidence. Evidence is either direct quotations or
paraphrases with page # citation.
Provides commentary on evidence; however commentary. Relationship between evidence and thesis
may not be thoroughly developed.
|
3-4 pieces of evidence. Evidence maybe mere summary w/o connection
to the thesis. Or there are vague
references to the text. References
could be vaguely relevant to thesis.
Little or no commentary (analysis).
|
No Analysis or examples or examples
are unclear. Repeats information
already provide or simply restates the thesis as evidence.
|
|
Sophistication of Writing
|
Point of view is evident. Clear sense of audience. Ideas are original. Work is engaging. Precise, fresh and original words. Sentence
variety. Effective use of rhetorical
devices such as parallelism or figurative language.
|
A sense of audience. Conveys ideas to reader. Use of rhetorical devices. Engaging vocabulary.
|
Paper lacks energy. Essay lacks focus and/or doesn’t
persuade. Language relies on
repetition of the same words or there is an overuse of “to be” verbs.
|
Voice is not apparent, or doesn’t
necessary seem that of the author.
|
|
Mechanics
|
One to three small mistakes
|
Three to five small mistakes that do
not affect the reading of the essay
|
Five to ten mistakes
|
Numerous mistakes that impair reading
|
4) THE CONNECTION: 1-2 pages connecting the
novel to a short story read in class. You may focus on theme,
characterization (think dynamic), or figurative language.
RUBRIC For Connection/Comparison Essay
|
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
|
Thesis
Statement
|
Clear
and defendable thesis, hook and order of development connect with thesis
|
Defendable
thesis, hook present
|
Thesis
statement attempted, but might be clunky, wordy, or unclear
|
No
thesis
|
|
Evidence
|
2
pieces of evidence for each point; evidence is analyzed and makes connections
between the evidence and the thesis
|
Two
pieces of evidence for each point; some analysis is made between the evidence
and thesis but it might be taken out of context, misinterpreted or oversimplified
|
Evidence
form at least two sources. No analysis
is made between the evidence and the thesis.
|
Body
paragraphs either simply restate the thesis or the evidence is unclear or
unrelated to the prompt, or less than two sources are provided.
|
|
Sophistication
of Writing
|
Effective
paragraph structures, high level vocabulary, vivid writing, varied sentence
structures and effective rhetorical choices
|
Some
high level vocabulary and some variety of sentence structures. Some effective rhetorical strategies.
|
Essay
use same words over and over again.
Sentences are wordy and/or clunky.
|
Student
makes sweeping generalizations or comparisons that are oversimplified. Very little variety in word choice and
sentence structure.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment